Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
[personal profile] hoisinsauce posting in [community profile] secretfanspace
POST NAMER TBC-- work harder, meme!

Welcome back, anyway! Chat fandom, media, creative things, weirdness from around the net, funny stuff, anything! Meme awaits!


(start a comment thread by replying to this post)
 
Depth: 1

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-08 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That dress is unwearable: don’t do it!

I have been trying to look at tops on Mango, but their models are so busy being cool that I cannot imagine how these clothes would really work. They have a model wearing a button-up shirt with a single button done up, and her tiny cool bandeau bra on show.
Depth: 2

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-08 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Took a look. I think the Mango tops look cheap! Suspect the materials are unpleasant.
Depth: 3

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-09 04:54 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
My suspicion, too. Someone linked a reasonably nice and practical top there, but I closed the tab and lost it, so I ended up searching through a sea of cool models in oddly-arranged polyester.
Depth: 2

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-08 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
> That dress is unwearable: don’t do it!

I am going to loiter in the dark like a set of gothic curtains or some particularly aggressive 90s wallpaper and u can't stop me

I'll tell you if it's shit, though
Depth: 3

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-08 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
(this was the dress with the pockets, not the purple top; I do still suspect that would look horrendous in person and need to resist the allure of CoolModel)
Depth: 4

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-08 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
And ah fuck, delivery with royal mail; looks like I'm never gonna see it. EVERY OTHER delivery company manages to get stuff to me without a problem, but Royal Mail always just redirects it to a post office in the middle of fucking nowhere, without a note; I work it out when the delivery fails to ever show up and then go on a retrieval adventure. 😑
Depth: 4

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-11 12:53 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Clothes arrived!

The gothy wallpaper-curtains dress is great! Perfect for autumnal loitering. It doesn't cling weirdly at the back like it does on the model. Idk why it falls like that on her, because it says she's a size 8 and this dan most definitely is not. It falls in pleats the same way it does at the front. The tie is just above the waist, so that it fits to your actual waist. Doesn't feel like the strongest tie, but it's flattering, so I hope it doesn't break. It's also one you pull on all-in-one; you have to dive for the neck-hole rather than step into it. Not my preference, but it's not tooooo awkward. The material is light and soft and smells nice.

Need to figure out what kind of coat/jacket can work with it.
Depth: 5

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-11 01:14 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
(and it does have pockets. They've been artfully placed so that putting anything in them makes your hips look bigger/waist look smaller)
Depth: 6

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-11 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
(do I look like an 80s-90s floral settee? Indubitably. But I liked that settee and I miss it.)
Depth: 5

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-11 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Ooo, congrats. I’m glad the model was just making it look weirder.
Depth: 6

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-11 06:21 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
:D The high waist means it does look a bit dumpy on me (I think it suits a smaller bust, though tbf haven't tried it with a decent bra yet). But I bought it for DRAMA, not shape.

Now I want a big black wide-brimmed hat to go with it, and a velvet jacket or two...
Depth: 6

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-11 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Yeahhh, looked again to check I hadn't been hallucinating... I have No Idea how they got it to look like that from behind. I can't do the splits wide enough to make this dress cling to my legs. I think the total circumference is about 2m of fabric.

The colours aren't as saturated as the picture (I should expect this by now, but it always surprises me!). This probably makes it more tasteful/go with more things, but would've personally preferred the more saturated look. And mine has much more pale pink and white above the waistline, where the model's dress has more black. This is annoying because it accentuates the bust in a cut that makes things look a bit potato-ey. But the design is otherwise cool. Pockets on each side, and the way the pattern wraps is clever; you don't notice it. I was really disappointed in the past, when I bought Desigual clothes, only to learn the designs disappeared on the back. Made them look super cheap (plus had "desigual" prominently embroidered on them!). I have a couple of garments from there that are nice... on one side.
Depth: 3

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-09 04:55 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Could you not simply wrap yourself in the curtains?
Depth: 4

Re: Clothes

Date: 2025-09-09 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
No pockets! Where am I to carry my gothic tomes*?

*custard creams

Profile

secretfanspace: A happy spidermite, still forbidden, just without 'no' visible (Default)
Anon fandom messageboard

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31 

Page Summary

Style Credit

Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 12:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios